Hybrid Publishing and the Boundaries of Editorial Discipline: Editorial Labor, Authorial Agency, and the Mediation of Value
Paper Presentation
Brigham Young University
Provo, Utah | August 6–7, 2026

Abstract: As editing and publishing (E&P) research grows, questions persist about where the discipline’s boundaries lie particularly when emerging publishing models disrupt inherited professional norms. Hybrid publishing occupies one such contested space. Frequently dismissed as “vanity publishing,” hybrid models nevertheless combine author-subsidized funding with professional editorial, design, and distribution practices, complicating traditional distinctions among self-, traditional, and open-access publishing.

This paper examines hybrid publishing through the lens of editorial labor and author–editor collaboration, with particular attention to how control over the manuscript is negotiated in different publishing models. In traditional publishing arrangements, editors often act as institutional gatekeepers, balancing authorial voice with market expectations, brand identity, and production constraints sometimes leading to significant manuscript intervention that authors may resist or only partially influence. Hybrid publishing, by contrast, positions authors as active partners throughout the editorial process, granting them greater agency in decision-making around revisions, design, and production timelines. While this collaborative proximity can empower authors and support more inclusive forms of knowledge production, it also raises persistent concerns about legitimacy: does increased author control risk devaluing editorial rigor, or does it merely challenge inherited assumptions about authority and quality? By analyzing these tensions, the paper interrogates whether hybrid publishing meaningfully reconfigures editorial practice or whether it remains vulnerable to being framed as vanity publishing within a polarized publishing landscape.

• Slide Deck

• Presentation

The Rhetoric of Hybrid Publishing: Negotiating Legitimacy and Stigma in the Modern Publishing Landscape
Paper Presentation
NOVA School of Social Sciences and Humanities
Lisbon, Portugal | July 1–3, 2026

Abstract: Hybrid publishing has become one of the most debated models in contemporary publishing, sitting at the intersection of traditional, self-, and open access pathways. Defined by the Independent Book Publishers Association (IBPA) as an author-subsidized model that maintains professional editorial, production, and distribution standards, hybrid publishing disrupts inherited notions of legitimacy, authority, and cultural value. While often dismissed as “vanity publishing,” many hybrid publishers uphold rigorous vetting and professional practices while offering authors greater creative agency and higher royalties. This paper explores how hybrid publishing is framed and contested in professional, institutional, and public discourse. Drawing on rhetorical analysis, digital ethnography, and author interviews, it investigates how legitimacy and stigma are negotiated in ways that reveal deeper cultural tensions: between democratization and gatekeeping, vocational practice and academic rigor, and commercial viability and cultural value. By situating hybrid publishing within the broader social practice of publishing, this paper highlights its significance as more than an alternative business model. It demonstrates how hybrid publishing reshapes access to cultural production, challenges entrenched hierarchies and reconfigures the role of publishers as mediators of social knowledge. The paper argues that Publishing Studies must take hybrid models seriously as they seek to exist beyond the peripheral or anomalous realms of the industry, as critical spaces where power, authorship, and knowledge are actively redefined. In doing so, hybrid publishing becomes a lens for examining broader questions of equity, legitimacy, and creative agency in a polarized information landscape.

• Slide Deck

• Presentation

Publishing in Partnership: Cultivating Author Relationships Through Hybrid Publishing
Poster Presentation
Texas Library Association
Houston, Texas | March 29–31, 2026

Abstract: Hybrid publishing redefines the author–publisher relationship through collaboration, transparency, and shared creative investment. This poster explores how hybrid publishers cultivate trust, empower authors, and build supportive networks that strengthen the broader publishing community. By centering partnership and the value of relationships, hybrid publishing offers an alternate publishing path to authors in an evolving literary and information landscape.

• Presentation

• Poster